Quantcast
HomeNews Newsdetails
Submit your e-mail to get CommodityOnline Advisory and news daily!

Last Updated : 08 December 2012 at 11:25 IST

Market may not have appetite for Copper ETFs: Barclays

Source :Commodity Online

  • 0

Snowdown of Barclays Research has also questioned the SEC Research on Copper ETFs released last month which concluded that there is no strong relationship between copper inventories and copper prices.

In fact, nature of India-China trade relationship should be in such a manner that it shoul...
As a direct result, Barclays heard during meetings last week that banks in coastal areas h..
I would also like to give you some more names of companies operating in Europe and making ..
Trading-tips
  • Commodity
  • |
  • Advise
  • |
  • Entry
  • |
  • Agency
  • Commodity
  • |
  • Contract
  • |
  • Trend
  • |
  • Pivot Point
Fundamentals
  • Norilsk Nickel announces closing of Lake Johnston operation in Australia
  • As per April 25 reports, Norilsk Nickel has announced that it is closing its Lake Johnston operat..

  • More >>
  • Astrology
  • Sun can push Crude Oil down any time: Astromoneyguru
  • By Col. Ajay
    As per financial astrology, transit OD Sun in Saturn house is ..

  • More >>
  • LONDON(Commodity Online): Physically backed copper ETFs is likely to be approved by US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in December but it may not have much impact on the market, according to Nicholas Snowdown, analyst of Barclays Research said in a report.

    “Limited investor appetite for a similar product issued in Europe in 2010 has demonstrated non-equivalence with the appetite for ETFs backed by precious metals. One argument that may have some validity is that, with Freeport McMoran diversifying into energy, US institutional investors may struggle to find a pure copper play via equities, making the launch of ETFs potentially opportune,” Snowdwon said in the report.

    Snowdown has also questioned the SEC Research on Copper ETFs released last month which concluded that there is no strong relationship between copper inventories and copper prices.

    The SEC’s conclusion, which seems to fly in the face of fundamental logic, have been reached via flawed methods? “ We think the Commission’s statistical copper price model posited some questionable causal variables, such as other metals prices, and note that it excluded key fundamental indicators, such as industrial production data. Moreover, the inventory data used (LME stocks) are, in our view, of limited utility relative to a broader indicator including bonded warehouse stocks in China. The study also ignores what we see as a strong relationship between stock levels and LME time spreads.

    Add Your Comments

    Post to twitter
    Post to facebook
    Comments