The Andhra Pradesh (AP) government’s move to review and bring down the purchase cost of wind and solar energy could aggravate the problem of delayed payments from distribution companies and stress ~5.2 GW of renewables projects with estimated debt exposure of over Rs 21,000 crore, credit rating agency CRISIL Research said.
Nearly half of this capacity is at higher risk of default since they lack liquidity support beyond project level.
The AP order, issued on July 1, 2019, directs a high-level negotiation committee to use current rates, rates prevalent at the time of commissioning of projects, and the current opportunity cost of other sources of power to benchmark and renegotiate agreements, and also submit its report to the state in 45 days, the agency said.
“Around 5.2 GW projects out of 7.5 GW in AP are supplying power to state distribution companies under long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) at pre-determined tariffs. They now face renegotiation risk given that their tariffs are above the recent auction prices of below Rs 3 per unit for renewable projects and average power purchase cost of Rs 3.8 per unit in AP in fiscal 2019,” said Manish Gupta, Senior Director, CRISIL Ratings.
This excludes inter-state transmission system projects of ~2 GW, where the exposure is to central counterparties (of NTPC Ltd. and Solar Energy Corporation of India) and are relatively safe as the payments to the developers are from the counterparties’ pooled cash flows.
Assuming a typical debt funding per MW of Rs 4 crore1, this would put ~Rs 21,000 crore of debt at risk of default.
That is because, in the event of any adverse recommendation by the committee, generators may take the legal route to stall implementation, which will prolong resolution and result in further delays in payment to renewable projects. AP distribution companies are already facing a significant resource crunch with revenue gap (revenue generated less the operating expenses) widening in fiscal 2019. Consequently, distribution companies have been delaying payments to generators by 6-12 months.
“Any prolonged delay would put ~50% of capacity (~2.6 GW with ~Rs 10,600 crore of debt) at immediate risk of default in debt servicing as these projects would have no other liquidity support apart from project-level liquidity reserves typically ~6 months of debt servicing,” said Ankit Hakhu, Associate Director, CRISIL Ratings.
The rest 50% of capacity (with ~Rs 10,400 crore of debt) may get a temporary lifeline being part of renewable groups or being part of corporates with strong financial flexibility. Such groups are prudently earmarking liquidity from recently raised capital at the holding company level, and may sustain debt servicing of such projects by another 6-12 months.
Issues of tariff renegotiation have also surfaced in the past in AP when distribution companies requested renegotiation of contracted wind tariffs to lower levels, which was rejected by the Andhra Pradesh Electricity Commission (APERC) by upholding the terms of the signed power purchase agreements. However there has been no stance from APERC on the current issue, so far.
A quick resolution here is also necessary to prevent vitiating of investor confidence in the sector, which is crucial to achieving the central government’s goal of 175 GW renewables capacity by fiscal 2022.